Legal Action Against Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
In a swift and collective response to President Donald Trump’s executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship for U.S.-born children, 22 state attorneys general have filed a lawsuit to challenge the initiative. Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser is among the plaintiffs who argue that the order violates constitutional rights. The order is set to take effect in February, sparking uncertainty and concern among many, including individuals like Maria, a Colorado resident who wished to remain anonymous for fear of repercussions.
Maria expressed her distress, particularly regarding her daughter, who is protected under DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). “It brings us anguish, anxiety, and frustration,” she said in Spanish, questioning the implications for her daughter if she were to have a child under the new decree.
Weiser stated that they were prepared for this legal challenge, emphasizing, “This attack on birthright citizenship is something that we were on notice about.” He reminded stakeholders that the 14th Amendment clearly states that anyone born on U.S. soil is entitled to citizenship, a precedent he plans to uphold in court. Legal experts, like University of Denver’s Professor Ian Farrell, noted that Trump’s legal arguments would likely hinge on interpretations of jurisdiction as outlined in the 14th Amendment.
Alongside the state attorneys general, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and various immigration advocacy groups have launched their lawsuits, all seeking a permanent block on the enforcement of the executive order. As legal battles unfold, citizens remain anxious about the future of birthright citizenship and its impact on families across the nation.