After Thanksgiving, many Americans shift their focus to Christmas, facing a dilemma when it comes to choosing between a fresh-cut real Christmas tree or an artificial one in terms of helping the planet. Although data shows that 70% of American households opt for artificial trees, an increasing number also have fresh trees as well. Artificial trees have a higher upfront carbon footprint compared to real trees, but their impact decreases over time with multiple years of use.
On the other hand, fresh-cut Christmas trees have the advantage of absorbing carbon dioxide while growing, providing habitat for wildlife, stabilizing soil, and emitting oxygen. Disposing of fresh trees in an eco-friendly way, such as mulching, is essential to maximize their environmental benefits. Options include recycling programs or using the tree to provide fish habitat in lakes.
When it comes to artificial trees, their environmental impact decreases with increased years of use. Buying second-hand artificial trees and replacing non-working lights with low-energy LEDs can extend their lifespan and reduce their overall carbon footprint. Disposing of artificial trees in landfills is not ideal, as they are not recyclable.
Ultimately, the most eco-friendly choice for the planet depends on the individual’s willingness to recycle and reuse either type of Christmas tree. Whether opting for a real or artificial tree, the key is to maximize its lifespan, reduce waste, and consider the environmental impact of its production, transport, and disposal.
Photo credit
www.usatoday.com
