Supporters of Denver’s only slaughterhouse, Superior Farms, gathered outside the City and County Building to oppose a ballot measure aiming to shut it down. The measure, initiated by Pro Animal Future, argues that slaughterhouses are inhumane. However, Superior Farms employees reject these claims, stating that the workplace feels like a family. Closure of the slaughterhouse would not only result in the loss of 160 jobs but also the need to import meat, affecting local businesses like restaurants. Superior Farms, known for incorporating humane animal handling practices developed by Temple Grandin, has been a staple in Denver’s Globeville and Elyria Swansea neighborhoods for 60 years.
The potential ban on Superior Farms has sparked a debate between grassroots organization, Pro Animal Future, and supporters of the slaughterhouse. While PAF claims that it is backed by local volunteers, opponents believe that out-of-state interests are funding the campaign. Concerns have been raised about the economic impacts of the ban, as Superior Farms provides significant economic benefits to Denver, according to a study by Colorado State University. The divide between urban and rural communities in the understanding of the livestock industry has also played a role in the debate.
The campaign finance data shows that those opposing the ban have raised significantly more funds compared to PAF. Major donations have come from livestock industry entities like the American Sheep Industry Association and the National Cattleman’s Beef Association. The debate over the closure of Superior Farms reflects broader issues related to animal welfare, economic impacts, and urban-rural divides.
Source
Photo credit denvergazette.com